Connect with us

Good & Bad

Postgame Wrap: Avalanche Enter Olympic Break On Winning Note

Published

on

The Avalanche are entering the Olympic break on a winning note. Following Wednesday night’s 4-2 victory over the San Jose Sharks at Ball Arena, Colorado enters the lengthy time off with a 37-9-9 record on the season and 21-3-4 at home.

Artturi Lehkonen had two goals. After a brief scare in the third period, Josh Manson tallied the game-winner before Brock Nelson capped off the night with an empty-netter. Valeri Nichushkin had three assists, and Nathan MacKinnon finished with two helpers, including the 700th of his career.

Mackenzie Blackwood made 23 saves as Colorado outshot San Jose 42-25. Yaroslav Askarov made 38 stops for the Sharks.

“We wanted to concentrate on our start and get on our toes a little bit here offensively,” head coach Jared Bednar said. “We’ve been having some games recently where it’s like five, six, nine shots a period. And when we’re really good and on our toes, we shoot for 15, you know, we want to be 12-15, a period, and give ourselves some good looks at the net. So that’s what we talked about.”

With the game knotted up at 2-2, Brent Burns was on his way to the box for tripping. Before the Avs could touch the puck, on the delay call, Burns’ stick was slashed by Macklin Celebrini, setting up a 4-on-4 for two minutes.

Colorado avoided a penalty kill. And while playing 4-on-4, Manson tallied his fifth of the season with 7:16 remaining to regain a lead that was lost earlier in the frame.

“It was kind of middle of the net. It was a screen,” Manson said.

The Avalanche came out flying. From the opening faceoff, they attacked the Sharks, created scoring chances, and were excellent at maintaining possession.

Had it not been for Askarov, Colorado could’ve easily been up by two or three goals through the first 20 minutes. Askarov stopped all 14 shots he faced. Blackwood was perfect on just five shots at the other end.

The second period began and the first goal followed shortly after. The Avs got on the Sharks right away again. After an initial save by Askarov, both teams battled in the crease for the loose puck and Lehkonen was able to tuck it home at 1:05.

The officials reviewed the play and confirmed that it would count. It was Lehkonen’s 18th of the season and his first in seven games.

Askarov continued to make strong saves until Lehkonen eventually added a second tally. MacKinnon fed it to his winger, who scored at 15:47 to make it 2-0.

Colorado went into the second period with a 32-12 shot advantage, including an 18-7 lead in the middle frame.

This game was all Avs. But the Sharks would not go away.

San Jose had an extra jump to start the third. It took just 43 seconds for them to finally break through and end Blackwood’s shutout bid. Timothy Liljegren fired it from the left circle, and the puck deflected off the stick of Avs forward Parker Kelly before taking an errant bounce over Blackwood’s pad.

The Sharks used that as a springboard to gain momentum. They got multiple odd-man rushes and had several shots coming up the wing, going one-on-one with the goalie. At 3:34, Philipp Kurashev scored to tie it up.

Blackwood had to make a handful of big saves after that, including a shoulder save on Kiefer Sherwood in his San Jose debut. Celebrini also had a good scoring chance from in between the hashmarks, but hit the post.

San Jose has lost three consecutive games in regulation heading into the break.

Good: The Avalanche Looked Like Themselves Again

It had been a while since the Avalanche dominated a game like that. Aside from the early parts of the third period, they were all over the Sharks. They suppressed the opposition’s chances, they forechecked well, and they cycled the puck with ease in the offensive zone.

It’s unfortunate that they could only muster two goals through the first 40 minutes, but Askarov was the biggest reason why. Aside from a struggling power play, the Avalanche were not letting up.

They need the break. But they also needed to be that team again one more time before the break.

Bad: Third Period Start

That can’t happen. After playing two nearly perfect periods, the Avs needed to come out for the third and close this game out. They shouldn’t have let the Sharks back in it.

The first goal was a fortunate bounce for San Jose, going off a stick, then up and over Blackwood. But after that goal, you could see the Sharks starting to smell blood, and the game-tying goal felt inevitable.

Losing this game after those first 40 minutes would’ve left a sour taste in everybody’s mouth. They managed to regroup and still get the two points in regulation. But you just can’t let that comeback happen.

26 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Joe Murphy

Nice to put a lot of pucks on net again. It’s also been enjoyable to watch the team without Necas -I’m not sure why. I like the physicality that MacK showed and Cale’s offense has looked so dangerous lately. Toews’ sliding stick poke was sick. Girard is garbage. Not because he almost blew the game, but when Sharks are set up in our zone and he is guarding the slot, he holds his stick like a guitar instead of keeping it on the ice so rebounds go right past him for additional scoring chances. Drury is really struggling on O.… Read more »

Last edited 5 days ago by Joe Murphy
Jeremy

Nobody wants to talk about the correlation between Mikko leaving & the PP going completely in the toilet. Nope! Nothing to see there! Just fire Dave Hakstol as if that will change a thing. This defense as presently constructed really scares me outside of the top pair. Burns looks worse defensively every game. And Girard’s deficiencies have been more pronounced this year. Him & Malinski don’t pair well together. To all the haters…I was right anout the Mikko trade. Looks like I was right about the Coyle trade too. Sure glad Ross Colton & Victor Olofsson are on the roster… Read more »

ricoflashback

More than your usual “Negative Nelly” today Jeremy. If someone would have told you that the Avs would be 37-9-9 at the break, would you have taken that? I agree on the PP. Rants was perfect on that right circle position, whipping his lethal left hand shot on goalies. And he’s a great passer, too. There’s no sense in crying over spilt milk. As I posted earlier, Mikko’s agent was hell bent on taking him to free agency. In hindsight, I wonder what would have happened if the Avs had offered the same $11.5M that Necas is getting? My guess… Read more »

Jeremy

Lol I’m purposely baiting today actually. Their record is great, but looking at the big picture/postseason is where my concern lies. I see the same issues as in past years.

ricoflashback

I thought my “Trade Mac, Cale and Necas” would get some kind of reaction but I guess it fell on deaf ears. I was hoping Sasha would have put that in the old “Sasha Trade Cycle” for a spin or two. I made a post about not caring what Bednar’s regular season record was/is but lots of folks here don’t see that it’s all about winning Stanley Cups – period. Yes, it’s entertainment but at the end of the day, it’s about raising that banner in the rafters and skating around with the coolest trophy in all of sports.

hockeyhead

Ok Ok, Jeremy, you are right! The PP sucks since Mikko left. The problem was Mikko was holding out for more than 12 mil and the Avs could not fit that into the cap structure for the next year or two. The Avs were between a rock and a hard place. Trade him and get something or risk losing him in FA when another team would have given him more than 12 mil. I really do not think Mikko was going to do the local discount to remain an Av. So it is great he helped win a cup in… Read more »

Ken

Yes it’s true that 96 gone is a big factor in our struggling PP. It is also true that 96 gone is a big factor in our almost record setting season at 5v5. Line 1 is way more defensively oriented without Moose. Personally I think the PP can improved with what we have, the 5v5 was never going to be this good with Mikko. The tunnel vision with regards to his departure is laughable. People act like we lost all 100 of his points, when we lost about 30 points and give up 100 less goals!!

Last edited 5 days ago by Ken
Jeremy

You have arguably the most out of touch with reality takes of any person who regularly comments on here. If you want to make the argument that the top 6 as a whole is better defensively because of Brock Nelson, that holds water. And with Landeskog in it, sure. But how in gods name is the top line with Marty the turnover machine Necas better defensively than with Rants? I’m not saying Rants is a selke candidate by any stretch, but Necas is an abysmal defensive forward. Rantanen is at least competent when engaged. Also it’s not about a slight… Read more »

Harvey Danger

Kenny? He gets one right every once in awhile….if you don’t consider every one out of ten to be bad. Lmao.

Brad Jacobs

Ok GM Jeremy. The Avs keep Coyle, don’t sign Olofsson and trade Colton for picks. That saves another $200k. So you have a 4th line of Kelly/Drury/Kivi and a third line of Coyle and who. U have $1.9m available. Fill those 2 wing spots with that money with guys who will produce somewhere between 35-40 points, are decent defensively and have previous post season experience. You also don’t have Brindley, so until OC returns, your 13th forward is Bardakov and then Eagles after that. If you use all that $1.9m you also have zero cap space at the TDL. Please… Read more »

Jeremy

What valuable contributions have they got from either Colton or Olofsson all year? Name one big goal (outside of an Olofsson hat trick in a NJ blowout). You act as if them both potentially finishing with some arbitrary amount of pts means anything. It’s empty calories. The value you get from Coyle still being on the roster far exceeds anything you get from those two. In this scenario without LOC I’d probably put Drury on the wing with Coyle. If LOC doesn’t come back you have that money to find another 3rd line wing, not difficult..especially at the deadline when… Read more »

Brad Jacobs

Sure Jeremy points don’t matter when evaluating player performance. It’s a big piece in how they get evaluated and payed. So yes I feel 35-40 points from a predominately third line role averaging around 13-14 minutes a night are solid contributions. Even if Olofsson is traded as part of a 3C or defensive upgrade, which I’m fine with, his play during the regular season at $1.5m has been a plus and it was a good offseason pickup for little cost. Your comments on Colton in the post season are ridiculous. He had 4 points in 11 games as center his… Read more »

Karl Keen

He twirls and twirls
floating and cartwheeling
All without a purpose

ricoflashback

The penalty in the 3rd Period by Celebrini was for slashing as he broke Burns stick in two out of frustration. Anyone notice when the Avs start playing more physical and finishing their checks, they seem to play better? More juice and energy. For a while there, it was looking like a nil nil soccer game. I watched a little bit of the Dallas game tonight and their NHL 2nd rated PP at 29.9% is certainly different in the way they approach it. Dallas works hard to gain the zone and then their wingers make quick moves to the net,… Read more »

Joe Murphy

If you believe NHL is all about special teams, we are toast against Dallas.
I wonder if CMAC is waiting to see who gets injured in Olympics before making his move, but he has to go for broke this year before selling the farm to keep Cale.

ricoflashback

Trade Mac, Cale and Necas. A little early on the “rebuild” but hey – – let’s get ahead of the curve.

Joe Cerwinske

I have never seen a bounce like the one on San Jose’s first goal in my life. Just wild, and nothing Blackwood or Kelly could have done about it. Puck luck at its finest.

Anderson

Nice to get the W. I brought them good luck last night! The top 6 looked gassed by the end, but MacK played with some snarl. 2nd Sharks goal was all on G. He could have dumped the puck back into the zone rather than toranading it into a partial break/2 on 0. I think Blackie would like to have a do-over on that shot. There were A LOT of Sharks fans at the game and that play really energized them. Avs looked much more dangerous 4 v 4 than on PP because they move and go to the net.… Read more »

Golden Boy

On the Sharks’ second goal, Malinski did everything wrong that one can think of. The only player he actually defended was Girard. Avs lucky not to face a PK after that goal.

coljack

90% on G. 10% on Malinmski who started skating forward when G was doing his figure skating on the blue line. Malinski should have pulled back to support him. Both inexcusable with a one goal lead.

Golden Boy

Girard got his pocket picked clean. Obvious to anybody. That is on him.

Malinski was the first domino. On the face off win he is supposed to maintain his position. Instead, he half-chases the puck, and he and Girard are two feet apart. This was a set play. Girard now has no left left side pass option. Now with the play broken, Malinski stands and watches, instead of getting back and more center. Girard tries to turn the broken play into something positive and accomplishes the opposite.

Harvey Danger

You? Criticizing Girard? Hath hell frozen over? 🤣

dk

Another proving that 2-0 is THE worst lead in hockey.

Golden Boy

And yet (I think) the Avs are undefeated this year when achieving a 2-goal lead.

dk

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2%E2%80%930_lead_is_the_worst_lead

Most teams win with a two goal lead when it is 3-1 or 4-2 and so on… 2-0 is different.

Joe Murphy

That’s an interesting stat

Don't Miss a Post!

Enter your email address to get all of our posts in your inbox!

Colorado's premier coverage of the Avalanche from professional hockey people. Evan Rawal, Editor-in-Chief. Part of the National Hockey Now family.

This site is in no way associated with the Colorado Avalanche or the NHL. Copyright © 2023 National Hockey Now.